CityMatch

Cities with low cost of living and good safety

Filtered to cities scoring at least 6/10 on affordability and 7/10 on safety, then ranked by a blend of both criteria plus overall livability.

94 cities ranked

Overview

Fukuoka tops our ranking of cities with low cost of living and good safety at 7.9/10, just ahead of Valencia and Vienna. Choosing where to live is easier with numbers in front of you than with a gut feeling. Cities with low cost of living and good safety is exactly that: a data-driven answer, not a listicle opinion. Filtered to cities scoring at least 6/10 on affordability and 7/10 on safety, then ranked by a blend of both criteria plus overall livability. Rather than sorting the full 303-city database by a single number, this list applies two filters at once and only keeps cities that clear both bars — a more realistic way to search than optimizing for one metric alone. Average safety across this list sits at 7.7/10 and average climate at 5.9/10 — both well above a random sample of world cities, which says as much about the filtering as it does about any individual entry. Fukuoka posts the strongest individual safety score in this group at 9/10, a detail the blended ranking above can obscure if safety happens to matter more to you than to the average reader. This kind of two-factor filter tends to surface less obvious picks than either single-criterion ranking would alone — cities that never top a "cheapest" or "safest" list individually but rarely disappoint on either front. The full ranking, full scorecards and links to each city's dedicated page are below.

Top pick
Fukuoka
7.9/10 overall
Most affordable here
Tbilisi
9/10 cost score
Average safety score
7.7/10
across 94 cities

Full ranking

Curious how the top two stack up criterion by criterion? Compare Fukuoka vs Valencia directly →

  1. 01FukuokaJapan · Asia7.9Score
  2. 02ValenciaSpain · Europe7.8Score
  3. 03ViennaAustria · Europe7.7Score
  4. 04LjubljanaSlovenia · Europe7.7Score
  5. 05TaipeiTaiwan · Asia7.7Score
  6. 06KaohsiungTaiwan · Asia7.7Score
  7. 07PortoPortugal · Europe7.6Score
  8. 08OsakaJapan · Asia7.6Score
  9. 09SapporoJapan · Asia7.6Score
  10. 10NagoyaJapan · Asia7.6Score
  11. 11LisbonPortugal · Europe7.5Score
  12. 12KyotoJapan · Asia7.5Score
  13. 13ZaragozaSpain · Europe7.5Score
  14. 14SalamancaSpain · Europe7.5Score
  15. 15BudapestHungary · Europe7.5Score
  16. 16BusanSouth Korea · Asia7.5Score
  17. 17KigaliRwanda · Africa7.5Score
  18. 18BilbaoSpain · Europe7.5Score
  19. 19PragueCzechia · Europe7.4Score
  20. 20VilniusLithuania · Europe7.4Score
  21. 21MadridSpain · Europe7.3Score
  22. 22TallinnEstonia · Europe7.3Score
  23. 23Kuala LumpurMalaysia · Asia7.3Score
  24. 24TbilisiGeorgia · Asia7.3Score
  25. 25GhentBelgium · Europe7.3Score
  26. 26DaeguSouth Korea · Asia7.3Score
  27. 27BrugesBelgium · Europe7.3Score
  28. 28SevilleSpain · Europe7.2Score
  29. 29WarsawPoland · Europe7.2Score
  30. 30KrakowPoland · Europe7.2Score
  31. 31SofiaBulgaria · Europe7.2Score
  32. 32SeoulSouth Korea · Asia7.2Score
  33. 33MalagaSpain · Europe7.2Score
  34. 34BordeauxFrance · Europe7.2Score
  35. 35NanjingChina · Asia7.2Score
  36. 36IncheonSouth Korea · Asia7.2Score
  37. 37ZagrebCroatia · Europe7.1Score
  38. 38BratislavaSlovakia · Europe7.1Score
  39. 39RigaLatvia · Europe7.1Score
  40. 40VallettaMalta · Europe7.1Score
  41. 41Chiang MaiThailand · Asia7.1Score
  42. 42TurinItaly · Europe7.1Score
  43. 43NantesFrance · Europe7.1Score
  44. 44Cluj-NapocaRomania · Europe7.1Score
  45. 45GdanskPoland · Europe7.1Score
  46. 46Da NangVietnam · Asia7.1Score
  47. 47BarcelonaSpain · Europe7.0Score
  48. 48RotterdamNetherlands · Europe7.0Score
  49. 49BucharestRomania · Europe7.0Score
  50. 50MontevideoUruguay · South America7.0Score
  51. 51LeipzigGermany · Europe7.0Score
  52. 52NurembergGermany · Europe7.0Score
  53. 53BolognaItaly · Europe7.0Score
  54. 54AlicanteSpain · Europe7.0Score
  55. 55StrasbourgFrance · Europe7.0Score
  56. 56WroclawPoland · Europe7.0Score
  57. 57ChengduChina · Asia7.0Score
  58. 58WuhanChina · Asia7.0Score
  59. 59KotorMontenegro · Europe7.0Score
  60. 60LyonFrance · Europe6.9Score
  61. 61FlorianopolisBrazil · South America6.9Score
  62. 62CologneGermany · Europe6.9Score
  63. 63CalgaryCanada · North America6.9Score
  64. 64CuritibaBrazil · South America6.9Score
  65. 65GuangzhouChina · Asia6.9Score
  66. 66Xi'anChina · Asia6.9Score
  67. 67HangzhouChina · Asia6.9Score
  68. 68Port LouisMauritius · Africa6.9Score
  69. 69Da LatVietnam · Asia6.9Score
  70. 70FlorenceItaly · Europe6.8Score
  71. 71AntwerpBelgium · Europe6.8Score
  72. 72ToulouseFrance · Europe6.8Score
  73. 73LilleFrance · Europe6.8Score
  74. 74Quebec CityCanada · North America6.8Score
  75. 75TashkentUzbekistan · Asia6.8Score
  76. 76YerevanArmenia · Asia6.8Score
  77. 77NicosiaCyprus · Europe6.8Score
  78. 78VeronaItaly · Europe6.8Score
  79. 79BerlinGermany · Europe6.7Score
  80. 80AlmatyKazakhstan · Asia6.7Score
  81. 81BakuAzerbaijan · Asia6.7Score
  82. 82MeridaMexico · North America6.7Score
  83. 83MontrealCanada · North America6.6Score
  84. 84Salt Lake CityUnited States · North America6.6Score
  85. 85WindhoekNamibia · Africa6.6Score
  86. 86GaboroneBotswana · Africa6.6Score
  87. 87Hoi AnVietnam · Asia6.6Score
  88. 88KochiIndia · Asia6.6Score
  89. 89CharlotteUnited States · North America6.5Score
  90. 90AmmanJordan · Asia6.5Score
  91. 91EssaouiraMorocco · Africa6.5Score
  92. 92SuvaFiji · Oceania6.3Score
  93. 93AstanaKazakhstan · Asia6.1Score
  94. 94UshuaiaArgentina · South America5.8Score

Methodology

Cities must clear minimum thresholds on two criteria at once to even appear on this list, then the remaining set is ranked by a blend of those two criteria plus the overall livability score. Want different priorities? Set your own weights in the recommender.

Understanding the criteria

Two criteria act as hard filters before ranking even starts — a city with a perfect score on one but a poor score on the other won't appear here at all, which is the entire point of a compound list like this one.

Tips for using this ranking

  • Because both filters have to clear a bar, this list is naturally shorter — treat every entry as a genuine finalist rather than skimming past the ones lower down.
  • Compare the top 2 head-to-head with the comparator tool; a compound ranking like this one often has closer margins than a single-criterion list.

Who this ranking is for

This ranking is most useful for Freelancers — independent workers balancing cost of living against healthcare access, Budget-conscious movers — movers for whom affordability outweighs every other factor and Safety-first movers — people relocating somewhere unfamiliar who weigh personal safety above all. If none of those match your situation, the recommender tool lets you set your own weights instead of relying on any preset list.

Strengths & limitations of this ranking

What this method gets right

  • +Requiring both criteria to clear a bar filters out the "great on paper, terrible in practice" cities a single-metric list would miss.
  • +Every city that appears here is a genuine finalist on both fronts, not just one.

What it doesn't capture

  • The two threshold cutoffs are somewhat arbitrary — a city just below the bar on one criterion might still be a great fit in practice.
  • A shorter list by design means fewer options overall than our single-criterion rankings.

How are these scores calculated?

Every city on CityMatch is scored 1-10 on seven criteria — cost of living, safety, environment, transport, climate, healthcare and internet — and those seven numbers are combined into the overall score shown throughout the site using a consistent, automated formula (an equal-weighted average by default, or your own weighting via the recommender tool). The same method is applied identically to every city, so scores are comparable across the full database.

Sources & data provenance

The current dataset is an internally curated starter dataset built for this version of the site, reflecting each city's general reputation on each criterion rather than a live feed from a single external provider. It is not yet sourced from a specific third-party API. If that changes, this section will be updated to name the exact sources in use.

Last updated: 17 July 2026

Frequently asked questions

Which city ranks #1 for "cities with low cost of living and good safety"?

Fukuoka tops this list with a score of 7.9/10. The next best are Fukuoka, Valencia, Vienna.

What's the most affordable city on this list?

Tbilisi is the most affordable, scoring 9/10 on cost of living (10 = cheapest).

What's the safest city on this list?

Fukuoka posts the strongest safety score here at 9/10, ahead of the 93 other cities on this list.

How is this ranking calculated?

Every city gets a 1-10 score on cost of living, safety, environment, transport, climate, healthcare and internet. This list's average safety score is 7.7/10 and average cost-of-living score is 6.9/10 across 94 cities.

Is this ranking kept up to date?

Yes — every score on this page is recalculated automatically from the same underlying dataset each time the site is rebuilt, so the ranking always reflects the current numbers rather than a static, one-off list. See the "How are these scores calculated?" section for the full methodology.

Related rankings