CityMatch

Best cities for digital nomads

Ranked for remote workers: fast internet, an affordable cost of living and a livable day-to-day pace.

89 cities ranked

Overview

Valencia tops our ranking of best cities for digital nomads at 8.0/10, just ahead of Fukuoka and Lisbon. There's no shortage of blog posts ranking cities from personal impressions. Best cities for digital nomads takes a different approach: the same seven-criterion scorecard, applied identically to every city, so the ranking below is reproducible rather than anecdotal. Ranked for remote workers: fast internet, an affordable cost of living and a livable day-to-day pace. We started from 303 cities worldwide and narrowed the field to the 89 that fit this lifestyle, then re-weighted our usual seven criteria to reflect what this audience typically prioritizes. Tbilisi stands out as the most affordable option in this set (9/10 on cost of living), which is useful context if budget matters more to you than the overall ranking order suggests. Just outside the top three, Taipei, Kuala Lumpur, Malaga round out a competitive upper half — worth a look if your specific circumstances (a partner's job, a language you already speak, an existing visa route) rule out the leaders. Treat this as a starting shortlist — the recommender tool further down the site lets you push the underlying weights around if your own priorities don't match the defaults used here. Scroll down for the full table — each city name links to its detailed scorecard if you want to dig into the individual numbers.

Top pick
Valencia
8.0/10 overall
Most affordable here
Tbilisi
9/10 cost score
Average safety score
6.9/10
across 89 cities

Full ranking

Curious how the top two stack up criterion by criterion? Compare Valencia vs Fukuoka directly →

  1. 01ValenciaSpain · Europe8.0Score
  2. 02FukuokaJapan · Asia7.8Score
  3. 03LisbonPortugal · Europe7.7Score
  4. 04TaipeiTaiwan · Asia7.7Score
  5. 05Kuala LumpurMalaysia · Asia7.5Score
  6. 06MalagaSpain · Europe7.5Score
  7. 07SingaporeSingapore · Asia7.4Score
  8. 08TbilisiGeorgia · Asia7.4Score
  9. 09Da NangVietnam · Asia7.3Score
  10. 10MedellinColombia · South America7.3Score
  11. 11Chiang MaiThailand · Asia7.3Score
  12. 12BarcelonaSpain · Europe7.2Score
  13. 13SeoulSouth Korea · Asia7.2Score
  14. 14IncheonSouth Korea · Asia7.2Score
  15. 15AlicanteSpain · Europe7.2Score
  16. 16TallinnEstonia · Europe7.1Score
  17. 17GuadalajaraMexico · North America7.1Score
  18. 18Cluj-NapocaRomania · Europe7.1Score
  19. 19RotterdamNetherlands · Europe7.1Score
  20. 20SofiaBulgaria · Europe7.1Score
  21. 21HelsinkiFinland · Europe7.0Score
  22. 22BucharestRomania · Europe7.0Score
  23. 23VilniusLithuania · Europe7.0Score
  24. 24Da LatVietnam · Asia7.0Score
  25. 25WarsawPoland · Europe7.0Score
  26. 26FlorianopolisBrazil · South America7.0Score
  27. 27ShenzhenChina · Asia7.0Score
  28. 28FrankfurtGermany · Europe7.0Score
  29. 29CopenhagenDenmark · Europe7.0Score
  30. 30Playa del CarmenMexico · North America7.0Score
  31. 31LeipzigGermany · Europe7.0Score
  32. 32ToulouseFrance · Europe7.0Score
  33. 33NantesFrance · Europe7.0Score
  34. 34UtrechtNetherlands · Europe7.0Score
  35. 35StuttgartGermany · Europe6.9Score
  36. 36DusseldorfGermany · Europe6.9Score
  37. 37Panama CityPanama · North America6.9Score
  38. 38GuangzhouChina · Asia6.9Score
  39. 39DenverUnited States · North America6.9Score
  40. 40BangkokThailand · Asia6.9Score
  41. 41Ho Chi Minh CityVietnam · Asia6.9Score
  42. 42Hong KongHong Kong · Asia6.9Score
  43. 43Salt Lake CityUnited States · North America6.9Score
  44. 44MonterreyMexico · North America6.9Score
  45. 45CancunMexico · North America6.9Score
  46. 46San Jose (Costa Rica)Costa Rica · North America6.9Score
  47. 47AmsterdamNetherlands · Europe6.8Score
  48. 48HangzhouChina · Asia6.8Score
  49. 49BakuAzerbaijan · Asia6.8Score
  50. 50Zanzibar CityTanzania · Africa6.8Score
  51. 51AntwerpBelgium · Europe6.8Score
  52. 52YerevanArmenia · Asia6.8Score
  53. 53BangaloreIndia · Asia6.7Score
  54. 54DubaiUnited Arab Emirates · Asia6.7Score
  55. 55MalmoSweden · Europe6.7Score
  56. 56ManamaBahrain · Asia6.7Score
  57. 57BerlinGermany · Europe6.7Score
  58. 58StockholmSweden · Europe6.7Score
  59. 59Denpasar (Bali)Indonesia · Asia6.7Score
  60. 60Tel AvivIsrael · Asia6.7Score
  61. 61WroclawPoland · Europe6.7Score
  62. 62BelgradeSerbia · Europe6.7Score
  63. 63CharlotteUnited States · North America6.7Score
  64. 64Cebu CityPhilippines · Asia6.7Score
  65. 65Hoi AnVietnam · Asia6.7Score
  66. 66AustinUnited States · North America6.6Score
  67. 67Mexico CityMexico · North America6.6Score
  68. 68Cape TownSouth Africa · Africa6.6Score
  69. 69ManchesterUnited Kingdom · Europe6.6Score
  70. 70BristolUnited Kingdom · Europe6.6Score
  71. 71PhuketThailand · Asia6.6Score
  72. 72Phnom PenhCambodia · Asia6.6Score
  73. 73AccraGhana · Africa6.5Score
  74. 74DallasUnited States · North America6.5Score
  75. 75MeridaMexico · North America6.5Score
  76. 76PattayaThailand · Asia6.5Score
  77. 77EssaouiraMorocco · Africa6.5Score
  78. 78PortlandUnited States · North America6.4Score
  79. 79RecifeBrazil · South America6.4Score
  80. 80Puerto VallartaMexico · North America6.4Score
  81. 81DublinIreland · Europe6.4Score
  82. 82NashvilleUnited States · North America6.3Score
  83. 83MinneapolisUnited States · North America6.3Score
  84. 84Cabo San LucasMexico · North America6.3Score
  85. 85SeattleUnited States · North America6.2Score
  86. 86NairobiKenya · Africa6.2Score
  87. 87San JoseUnited States · North America6.1Score
  88. 88San FranciscoUnited States · North America6.0Score
  89. 89TorontoCanada · North America6.0Score

Methodology

Cities are scored 1-10 on seven criteria — cost of living, safety, environment, transport, climate, healthcare and internet — then re-weighted specifically for this list before ranking, rather than using a flat average across all seven. Want different priorities? Set your own weights in the recommender.

Understanding the criteria

This list leans hardest on the criteria that matter most for this lifestyle rather than treating all seven equally — a city can rank highly here even with a mediocre score on a criterion this audience typically cares less about, and miss the top spots despite strong all-round numbers if it's weak on the criteria that matter most for this use case.

Tips for using this ranking

  • Don't stop at the top result — compare your top 2-3 picks head-to-head using the comparator, since a 0.2-point gap in the overall score can hide a much bigger difference on the one criterion you actually care about.
  • If your budget is fixed, sort mentally by Tbilisi's cost-of-living score (9/10) as a floor, then work down this list rather than up it.

Who this ranking is for

This ranking is most useful for Digital nomads — remote workers who need fast internet and an affordable, pleasant base, Freelancers — independent workers balancing cost of living against healthcare access and Expats — expatriates relocating for work who lean on safety, healthcare and internet to stay settled and connected. If none of those match your situation, the recommender tool lets you set your own weights instead of relying on any preset list.

Strengths & limitations of this ranking

What this method gets right

  • +Every city is scored with the exact same weighting, so the order reflects consistent math rather than one writer's opinion.
  • +Re-weighting toward this lifestyle's priorities means a city can't coast to the top on an unrelated strength.

What it doesn't capture

  • The re-weighting reflects our general assumptions about this lifestyle, not your personal priorities — the recommender tool lets you override it.
  • It can't account for things we don't score, like visa rules, a specific neighborhood, or a language you already speak.

How are these scores calculated?

Every city on CityMatch is scored 1-10 on seven criteria — cost of living, safety, environment, transport, climate, healthcare and internet — and those seven numbers are combined into the overall score shown throughout the site using a consistent, automated formula (an equal-weighted average by default, or your own weighting via the recommender tool). The same method is applied identically to every city, so scores are comparable across the full database.

Sources & data provenance

The current dataset is an internally curated starter dataset built for this version of the site, reflecting each city's general reputation on each criterion rather than a live feed from a single external provider. It is not yet sourced from a specific third-party API. If that changes, this section will be updated to name the exact sources in use.

Last updated: 17 July 2026

Frequently asked questions

Which city ranks #1 for "best cities for digital nomads"?

Valencia tops this list with a score of 8.0/10. The next best are Valencia, Fukuoka, Lisbon.

What's the most affordable city on this list?

Tbilisi is the most affordable, scoring 9/10 on cost of living (10 = cheapest).

What's the safest city on this list?

Singapore posts the strongest safety score here at 10/10, ahead of the 88 other cities on this list.

How is this ranking calculated?

Every city gets a 1-10 score on cost of living, safety, environment, transport, climate, healthcare and internet. This list's average safety score is 6.9/10 and average cost-of-living score is 6.3/10 across 89 cities.

Is this ranking kept up to date?

Yes — every score on this page is recalculated automatically from the same underlying dataset each time the site is rebuilt, so the ranking always reflects the current numbers rather than a static, one-off list. See the "How are these scores calculated?" section for the full methodology.

Related rankings