CityMatch

Cheapest cities with a good quality of life

Low cost of living that doesn't come at the expense of safety or basic services.

145 cities ranked

Overview

Fukuoka tops our ranking of cheapest cities with a good quality of life at 7.8/10, just ahead of Valencia and Porto. "Cheapest cities with a good quality of life" is one of the most searched relocation questions we track — and most articles answering it are written from a single traveler's memory, not from consistent data across cities. Low cost of living that doesn't come at the expense of safety or basic services. We started from 303 cities worldwide and narrowed the field to the 145 that fit this lifestyle, then re-weighted our usual seven criteria to reflect what this audience typically prioritizes. It's worth noting the spread: scores here range from 7.8 down to 4.9, so position #1 and position #145 aren't just marginally different — they represent genuinely different day-to-day experiences. The gap between the #1 and #3 spots is often smaller than it looks: a 0.3-point difference in an aggregate score can come from a single criterion, so it's worth opening a city's full scorecard rather than trusting the headline number alone. Treat this as a starting shortlist — the recommender tool further down the site lets you push the underlying weights around if your own priorities don't match the defaults used here. Below is the complete list with every underlying score, plus links through to a full breakdown for each city.

Top pick
Fukuoka
7.8/10 overall
Most affordable here
Tbilisi
9/10 cost score
Average safety score
6.2/10
across 145 cities

Full ranking

Curious how the top two stack up criterion by criterion? Compare Fukuoka vs Valencia directly →

  1. 01FukuokaJapan · Asia7.8Score
  2. 02ValenciaSpain · Europe7.7Score
  3. 03PortoPortugal · Europe7.5Score
  4. 04OsakaJapan · Asia7.5Score
  5. 05KaohsiungTaiwan · Asia7.5Score
  6. 06LisbonPortugal · Europe7.5Score
  7. 07ZaragozaSpain · Europe7.4Score
  8. 08SalamancaSpain · Europe7.4Score
  9. 09MadridSpain · Europe7.3Score
  10. 10BusanSouth Korea · Asia7.3Score
  11. 11PragueCzechia · Europe7.3Score
  12. 12BudapestHungary · Europe7.3Score
  13. 13VilniusLithuania · Europe7.2Score
  14. 14TallinnEstonia · Europe7.2Score
  15. 15KigaliRwanda · Africa7.2Score
  16. 16GhentBelgium · Europe7.2Score
  17. 17Kuala LumpurMalaysia · Asia7.2Score
  18. 18SevilleSpain · Europe7.1Score
  19. 19RotterdamNetherlands · Europe7.1Score
  20. 20TbilisiGeorgia · Asia7.1Score
  21. 21TurinItaly · Europe7.1Score
  22. 22DaeguSouth Korea · Asia7.1Score
  23. 23RigaLatvia · Europe7.0Score
  24. 24LeipzigGermany · Europe7.0Score
  25. 25WarsawPoland · Europe7.0Score
  26. 26SofiaBulgaria · Europe7.0Score
  27. 27MontevideoUruguay · South America7.0Score
  28. 28Cluj-NapocaRomania · Europe7.0Score
  29. 29LyonFrance · Europe7.0Score
  30. 30ZagrebCroatia · Europe7.0Score
  31. 31GdanskPoland · Europe7.0Score
  32. 32Da NangVietnam · Asia7.0Score
  33. 33KrakowPoland · Europe6.9Score
  34. 34BratislavaSlovakia · Europe6.9Score
  35. 35MedellinColombia · South America6.9Score
  36. 36CalgaryCanada · North America6.9Score
  37. 37CuritibaBrazil · South America6.9Score
  38. 38BucharestRomania · Europe6.8Score
  39. 39Chiang MaiThailand · Asia6.8Score
  40. 40LilleFrance · Europe6.8Score
  41. 41WroclawPoland · Europe6.8Score
  42. 42ThessalonikiGreece · Europe6.8Score
  43. 43KotorMontenegro · Europe6.8Score
  44. 44Da LatVietnam · Asia6.8Score
  45. 45BerlinGermany · Europe6.8Score
  46. 46MontrealCanada · North America6.7Score
  47. 47TunisTunisia · Africa6.7Score
  48. 48ChengduChina · Asia6.7Score
  49. 49WuhanChina · Asia6.7Score
  50. 50AlgiersAlgeria · Africa6.7Score
  51. 51MarseilleFrance · Europe6.7Score
  52. 52AthensGreece · Europe6.7Score
  53. 53GuadalajaraMexico · North America6.7Score
  54. 54Buenos AiresArgentina · South America6.7Score
  55. 55Porto AlegreBrazil · South America6.7Score
  56. 56GenoaItaly · Europe6.6Score
  57. 57SkopjeNorth Macedonia · Europe6.6Score
  58. 58San Jose (Costa Rica)Costa Rica · North America6.6Score
  59. 59Xi'anChina · Asia6.6Score
  60. 60TashkentUzbekistan · Asia6.6Score
  61. 61YerevanArmenia · Asia6.6Score
  62. 62WindhoekNamibia · Africa6.6Score
  63. 63CasablancaMorocco · Africa6.5Score
  64. 64ColomboSri Lanka · Asia6.5Score
  65. 65GaboroneBotswana · Africa6.5Score
  66. 66ChisinauMoldova · Europe6.5Score
  67. 67QuitoEcuador · South America6.5Score
  68. 68AlmatyKazakhstan · Asia6.5Score
  69. 69PalermoItaly · Europe6.5Score
  70. 70BelgradeSerbia · Europe6.5Score
  71. 71TiranaAlbania · Europe6.5Score
  72. 72MeridaMexico · North America6.5Score
  73. 73RosarioArgentina · South America6.5Score
  74. 74NaplesItaly · Europe6.4Score
  75. 75SantiagoChile · South America6.4Score
  76. 76Ho Chi Minh CityVietnam · Asia6.4Score
  77. 77MonterreyMexico · North America6.4Score
  78. 78Hoi AnVietnam · Asia6.4Score
  79. 79KochiIndia · Asia6.4Score
  80. 80BangkokThailand · Asia6.3Score
  81. 81IslamabadPakistan · Asia6.3Score
  82. 82BishkekKyrgyzstan · Asia6.3Score
  83. 83CotonouBenin · Africa6.3Score
  84. 84MarrakechMorocco · Africa6.3Score
  85. 85PhiladelphiaUnited States · North America6.3Score
  86. 86BarranquillaColombia · South America6.3Score
  87. 87EssaouiraMorocco · Africa6.3Score
  88. 88IstanbulTurkey · Asia6.3Score
  89. 89BirminghamUnited Kingdom · Europe6.3Score
  90. 90LiverpoolUnited Kingdom · Europe6.3Score
  91. 91SarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina · Europe6.3Score
  92. 92CaliColombia · South America6.3Score
  93. 93AmmanJordan · Asia6.3Score
  94. 94Addis AbabaEthiopia · Africa6.3Score
  95. 95ValparaisoChile · South America6.2Score
  96. 96HanoiVietnam · Asia6.2Score
  97. 97BangaloreIndia · Asia6.2Score
  98. 98KyivUkraine · Europe6.2Score
  99. 99Cebu CityPhilippines · Asia6.2Score
  100. 100Mexico CityMexico · North America6.1Score
  101. 101DallasUnited States · North America6.1Score
  102. 102San AntonioUnited States · North America6.1Score
  103. 103AsuncionParaguay · South America6.1Score
  104. 104VientianeLaos · Asia6.1Score
  105. 105Phnom PenhCambodia · Asia6.0Score
  106. 106AtlantaUnited States · North America6.0Score
  107. 107Sao PauloBrazil · South America6.0Score
  108. 108Santa Cruz de la SierraBolivia · South America6.0Score
  109. 109MaputoMozambique · Africa6.0Score
  110. 110La PazBolivia · South America5.9Score
  111. 111LusakaZambia · Africa5.9Score
  112. 112AstanaKazakhstan · Asia5.9Score
  113. 113HoustonUnited States · North America5.8Score
  114. 114CairoEgypt · Africa5.8Score
  115. 115KampalaUganda · Africa5.8Score
  116. 116MombasaKenya · Africa5.8Score
  117. 117LimaPeru · South America5.8Score
  118. 118JohannesburgSouth Africa · Africa5.8Score
  119. 119NairobiKenya · Africa5.8Score
  120. 120AbidjanIvory Coast · Africa5.8Score
  121. 121Santo DomingoDominican Republic · North America5.8Score
  122. 122LivingstoneZambia · Africa5.8Score
  123. 123Guatemala CityGuatemala · North America5.8Score
  124. 124Dar es SalaamTanzania · Africa5.7Score
  125. 125HarareZimbabwe · Africa5.7Score
  126. 126JaipurIndia · Asia5.7Score
  127. 127BogotaColombia · South America5.7Score
  128. 128GuayaquilEcuador · South America5.7Score
  129. 129LahorePakistan · Asia5.7Score
  130. 130CuscoPeru · South America5.7Score
  131. 131JakartaIndonesia · Asia5.6Score
  132. 132ManilaPhilippines · Asia5.6Score
  133. 133MumbaiIndia · Asia5.6Score
  134. 134YangonMyanmar · Asia5.6Score
  135. 135KarachiPakistan · Asia5.6Score
  136. 136Siem ReapCambodia · Asia5.6Score
  137. 137AntananarivoMadagascar · Africa5.5Score
  138. 138KathmanduNepal · Asia5.5Score
  139. 139AgraIndia · Asia5.5Score
  140. 140LagosNigeria · Africa5.3Score
  141. 141DhakaBangladesh · Asia5.3Score
  142. 142DelhiIndia · Asia5.3Score
  143. 143ManausBrazil · South America5.3Score
  144. 144KinshasaDR Congo · Africa4.9Score
  145. 145UlaanbaatarMongolia · Asia4.9Score

Methodology

Cities are scored 1-10 on seven criteria — cost of living, safety, environment, transport, climate, healthcare and internet — then re-weighted specifically for this list before ranking, rather than using a flat average across all seven. Want different priorities? Set your own weights in the recommender.

Understanding the criteria

This list leans hardest on the criteria that matter most for this lifestyle rather than treating all seven equally — a city can rank highly here even with a mediocre score on a criterion this audience typically cares less about, and miss the top spots despite strong all-round numbers if it's weak on the criteria that matter most for this use case.

Tips for using this ranking

  • Don't stop at the top result — compare your top 2-3 picks head-to-head using the comparator, since a 0.2-point gap in the overall score can hide a much bigger difference on the one criterion you actually care about.
  • If your budget is fixed, sort mentally by Tbilisi's cost-of-living score (9/10) as a floor, then work down this list rather than up it.

Who this ranking is for

This ranking is most useful for Freelancers — independent workers balancing cost of living against healthcare access and Budget-conscious movers — movers for whom affordability outweighs every other factor. If none of those match your situation, the recommender tool lets you set your own weights instead of relying on any preset list.

Strengths & limitations of this ranking

What this method gets right

  • +Every city is scored with the exact same weighting, so the order reflects consistent math rather than one writer's opinion.
  • +Re-weighting toward this lifestyle's priorities means a city can't coast to the top on an unrelated strength.

What it doesn't capture

  • The re-weighting reflects our general assumptions about this lifestyle, not your personal priorities — the recommender tool lets you override it.
  • It can't account for things we don't score, like visa rules, a specific neighborhood, or a language you already speak.

How are these scores calculated?

Every city on CityMatch is scored 1-10 on seven criteria — cost of living, safety, environment, transport, climate, healthcare and internet — and those seven numbers are combined into the overall score shown throughout the site using a consistent, automated formula (an equal-weighted average by default, or your own weighting via the recommender tool). The same method is applied identically to every city, so scores are comparable across the full database.

Sources & data provenance

The current dataset is an internally curated starter dataset built for this version of the site, reflecting each city's general reputation on each criterion rather than a live feed from a single external provider. It is not yet sourced from a specific third-party API. If that changes, this section will be updated to name the exact sources in use.

Last updated: 17 July 2026

Frequently asked questions

Which city ranks #1 for "cheapest cities with a good quality of life"?

Fukuoka tops this list with a score of 7.8/10. The next best are Fukuoka, Valencia, Porto.

What's the most affordable city on this list?

Tbilisi is the most affordable, scoring 9/10 on cost of living (10 = cheapest).

What's the safest city on this list?

Fukuoka posts the strongest safety score here at 9/10, ahead of the 144 other cities on this list.

How is this ranking calculated?

Every city gets a 1-10 score on cost of living, safety, environment, transport, climate, healthcare and internet. This list's average safety score is 6.2/10 and average cost-of-living score is 7.4/10 across 145 cities.

Is this ranking kept up to date?

Yes — every score on this page is recalculated automatically from the same underlying dataset each time the site is rebuilt, so the ranking always reflects the current numbers rather than a static, one-off list. See the "How are these scores calculated?" section for the full methodology.

Related rankings